PART ONE

365-195-010 Background
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	3
I have not consulted this section.	8	This works fine.	4
	30%		31%
I have consulted it.	16	Consider minor refinements	8
	59%		62%
I use this section of the WAC often.	3	A major revision is needed.	1
	11%		8%
Response Count	27	Response Count	16

365-195-020 Purpose.

365-195-020 Purpose and scope
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	3
I have not consulted this section.	8	This works fine.	4
	31%		31%
I have consulted it.	16	Consider minor refinements	4
	62%		31%
I use this section of the WAC often.	2	A major revision is needed.	5
	8%		38%
Response Count	26	Response Count	16

While the criteria suggested may not be minimum actions, there is the need for setting baselines and standards and measuring goal achievement levels in each plan. CTED was given no deadlines, performance standards or goals in how to achieve the purpose. These need to be added.	Survey Comment
Cleary define how the WACs are to be used in interpreting the statute.	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Technical assistance objectives of the Department should include industry and association resources as they relate to the objectives of the act.	Survey Comment
If counties and cities set measurable standards for achieving goals, everyone can determine what needs to happen to achieve the goals. See Marin Co. new plan and goals with a variety of measurements to monitor achievement.	Survey Comment

365-195-030 Applicability.

365-195-030 Applicability
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	2
I have not consulted this section.	7	This works fine.	4
	27%		29%
I have consulted it.	17	Consider minor refinements	6
	65%		43%
I use this section of the WAC often.	2	A major revision is needed.	4
	8%		29%
Response Count	26	Response Count	16

none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
CTED should act as the caretaker of the guidelines and as necessary bring issues to the GMHB for clarification and / or as necessary act as initial arbitrator of disputed planning practices.	Survey Comment

365-195-040 General method.

365-195-040 General Method
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	0
I have not consulted this section.	0	This works fine.	0
	0%		0%
I have consulted it.	0	Consider minor refinements	0
	0%		0%
I use this section of the WAC often.	0	A major revision is needed.	0
	0%		0%
Response Count	0	Response Count	0

There is still no way to tell if goals are achieved for the actions which are set forth in the act and/or have been determined by the hearings boards.	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Requiring citizens to bring appeals to correct inappropriate plans means we all get poor planning decisions. Wouldn't it be better to assure the plan validity before adoption and reduce the appeals. Also, the burden of proof should be on the county, not the citizens alone, especially when the county created the plan sometimes with little citizen input.	Survey Comment

365-195-050 Presumption of validity.

365-195-050 Presumption of validity
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	3
I have not consulted this section.	11	This works fine.	3
	42%		23%
I have consulted it.	14	Consider minor refinements	7
	54%		54%
I use this section of the WAC often.	1	A major revision is needed.	3
	4%		23%
Response Count	26	Response Count	16

none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Ensure this reflects current case law.	Survey Comment
Presumption of validity upon adoption should be revisited. Bench-marks for public and industry participation should be encouraged to insure all stakeholders had knowledge of and ability to participate. Review prior to presumption of validity should be considered.	Survey Comment

365-195-060 Regional and local variations.

365-195-060 Regional and local variation
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?
		I am not familiar with this section	3
I have not consulted this section.	10	This works fine.	3
	40%		23%
I have consulted it.	14	Consider minor refinements	5
	56%		38%
I use this section of the WAC often.	1	A major revision is needed.	5
	4%		38%
Response Count	25	Response Count	16

Much more work needs to be done on bottoms up public input. The appointed Citizen advisory commitees are not representative and often cannot oversight the plan. CTED needs additional expertise in the ways to do community planning and teach counties, especially elected officials and planning staff the benefits of this process.	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment

365-195-070 Interpretations.

365-195-070 Interpretations
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	2
I have not consulted this section.	8	This works fine.	4
	31%		29%
I have consulted it.	17	Consider minor refinements	5
	65%		36%
I use this section of the WAC often.	1	A major revision is needed.	5
	4%		36%
Response Count	26	Response Count	16

365-195-070-1 GMA Goals
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	3
I have not consulted this section.	5	This works fine.	4
	19%		25%
I have consulted it.	12	Consider minor refinements	6
	44%		38%
I use this section of the WAC often.	10	A major revision is needed.	6
	37%		38%
Response Count	27	Response Count	19

365-195-070-2 Economic development
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	3
I have not consulted this section.	6	This works fine.	3
	25%		21%
I have consulted it.	14	Consider minor refinements	5
	58%		36%
I use this section of the WAC often.	4	A major revision is needed.	6
	17%		43%
Response Count	24	Response Count	17

365-195-070-3 Concurrency
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	2
I have not consulted this section.	5	This works fine.	2
	19%		13%
I have consulted it.	14	Consider minor refinements	8
	54%		53%
I use this section of the WAC often.	7	A major revision is needed.	5
	27%		33%
Response Count	26	Response Count	17

365-195-070-4 Essential public facilities
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	1
I have not consulted this section.	6	This works fine.	7
	24%		50%
I have consulted it.	15	Consider minor refinements	3
	60%		21%
I use this section of the WAC often.	4	A major revision is needed.	4
	16%		29%
Response Count	25	Response Count	15

365-195-070-5 Urban growth areas
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	2
I have not consulted this section.	5	This works fine.	3
	19%		21%
I have consulted it.	13	Consider minor refinements	4
	48%		29%
I use this section of the WAC often.	9	A major revision is needed.	7
	33%		50%
Response Count	27	Response Count	16

365-195-070-6 Affordable housing
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	3
I have not consulted this section.	10	This works fine.	5
	43%		42%
I have consulted it.	9	Consider minor refinements	4
	39%		33%
I use this section of the WAC often.	4	A major revision is needed.	3
	17%		25%
Response Count	23	Response Count	15

365-195-070-7 Consistency
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	5
I have not consulted this section.	8	This works fine.	2
	32%		18%
I have consulted it.	9	Consider minor refinements	4
	36%		36%
I use this section of the WAC often.	8	A major revision is needed.	5
	32%		45%
Response Count	25	Response Count	16

I haven't reviewed these sections recently enough to make suggestions.	Survey Comment
Need a separate section on rural lands. Need addition of cumulative assessments in 2,3,4,5,6.	Survey Comment
The goals of GMA may not be prioritized, but they damn sure are locally. Property rights and the mandate to preserve Agricultural lands is a prime example (assuming that property rights remain undefined, it will continue to be defined as the right to build anywhere anytime)	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Local jurisdictions pick and choose which of the 13 goals they what to include and provide within their comp. plans. The WAC should be changed to stress that one goal does not trump another goal. All thirteen goals should be updated every five years if necessary.	Survey Comment
Require or create incentives with proportions of affordable housing based on needs assessment of a given area and projection of population. Set goals with timelines for achievement and integrate into policies and programs. More technical assistance from CTED needed.	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Requirements and/or incentives for concurrency within a time deadline is crucial. We aren't achieving this inside or outside urban areas. UGAs are the worst example of not meeting concurrency requirements.	Survey Comment
More on whether concurrency can be measured globally or project-by-project.	Survey Comment
No teeth. Cities do not comply with concurrency and counties allow annexations without compliance. Clearer direction needs to be added.	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
This is a good goal. The problem it needs to be enforced. To many jurisdictions allow development to over run their transportation facilities.	Survey Comment
Plans should be consistent with other state and federal programs, regional plans and/or programs or regulations. CTED should work with other agencies to determine when existing or proposed programs are not consistent with GMA and devise a method of correction to the sub-standard programs.	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Economic development section needs to include resource lands.	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Economic development is an important goal of any comp. plan. All comp. plans should include the economic growth needed to maintain the facilities required by the other 12 goals.	Survey Comment
Notification of proposed sitings to adjoining property owners (with the area set by some assessment of the effects of traffic, etc.) should be by mail and more than one time during the planning process.	Survey Comment
none	Survey Comment
historic preservation	Survey Comment
Wastewater and Water Treatment facilities are very important and should be listed.	Survey Comment
consider mineral resource lands. By its fundamental nature mineral resources especially sand and gravel are essential building blocks for transportation, infrastructure and other related comp plan required elements (housing etc). proximity to market is the primary influence to the cost of materials to market.	Survey Comment

365-195-200 Statutory definitions.

Not Surveyed

365-195-210 Definitions of terms as used in this chapter.

Answer Options	Works Fine	Minor Refine-ments	Major revision needed.	Not Familiar	Response Count
Adequate Public Facilities	0	6	3	4	13
Affordable Housing	1	3	4	5	13
Available public facilities	1	4	4	4	13
Concurrency	2	6	5	2	15
Consistency	2	6	3	3	14
Coordination	2	6	3	3	14
Contiguous development	3	4	3	4	14
[transportation] Demand Management Strategies	3	3	2	5	13
Domestic water supply	3	5	2	4	14
Financial commitment	1	5	2	5	13
Growth Management Act	3	5	7	1	16
Level of service	1	10	3	1	15
Master planned resort	1	6	4	4	15
New fully contained community	1	4	3	6	14
Planning Period	2	5	4	3	14
Public service obligations	2	4	2	5	13
Regional transportation planning organization	3	3	2	5	13
Rural Lands	1	5	6	4	16
Sanitary sewer systems	2	4	3	5	14
Solid waste handling facility	2	5	1	5	13
Transportation facilities	3	4	3	3	13
Transportation level of service standards	3	6	3	1	13
Transportation system management	3	5	2	3	13

365-195-220 Additional definitions to be adopted locally.

This section was not surveyed individually

365-195-300 Mandatory elements.

This section was not surveyed individually

365-195-305 Land use element.

365-195-305 Land use element
Have you ever consulted the following sections of the Procedural Criteria?		How essential is it that this section be updated?
		I am not familiar with this section	2
I have not consulted this section.	3	This works fine.